A diction
rhetorical setbacks – a brief study on the distinction of the concepts of language, language, speech and discourse in Lacan
Abstract
Would it there be a way to say something without it being soon and readily transformed into meaning, deciphered and digested? Could it be a mistake to make the bases slightly inconsistent in order to maintain insignificance? And yet to say, speaking of a distinction, expatiating and discourse on spoken and combined language, so as to bring forth and spark some Thing which is in the field, in this psychoanalytic field of speech and language, whose function of equivocation appears in the field of lalangue: that’s what we tried, however bittersweet it may be. Or, more simply, as an attempt of the present work, it is aimed at a discussion about some central concepts of the Lacanian thought – namely, language, language, speech and discourse -, in order to realize a weighting related to the impasses of our vehicular symbolic.
##submission.citations##
KRUGER, F. Gozar do sintoma. In: O sintoma-charlatão. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, p. 1001-109, 1996.
LACAN, J. A função criativa da palavra - Cap. XIX. In: Seminário I. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1996.
______. Conferência em Genebra sobre o sintoma. Opção lacaniana, n. 23, dezembro de 1998.
______. Escritos. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2000.
MELLO, H. H. de S. Acta de psicanálise (vol. XII, cap. III - Colégio Freudiano de Psicanálise). Brasília: Linha Gráfica e Editora, 1987.
MILLER, J-A. Seminário sobre caminhos da formação de sintomas. In: Opção lacaniana, n. 60, São Paulo, 2011, p. 11-37.
MILNER, J-C. Linguística e Psicanálise. Rev. Estud. Lacan., Belo Horizonte, v. 3, n. 4, 2010.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc4.footer##
